Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In some of the calorimeters, such as the forward hadronic calorimeter insert and the ZDC, it doesn't make sense to define the "neighboring" hits on different layers in terms of Δη and Δφ. Instead, it makes more sense to use cartesian position differences, Δx and Δy.
Describe the solution you'd like
Create a new mode for the topo clustering that allows it to used Δx and Δy to define which hits in adjacent layers are neighbors to one another. Add new parameters as appropriate. Also, have this mode be used for both the ZDC and the calorimeter insert.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. In some of the calorimeters, such as the forward hadronic calorimeter insert and the ZDC, it doesn't make sense to define the "neighboring" hits on different layers in terms of Δη and Δφ. Instead, it makes more sense to use cartesian position differences, Δx and Δy.
Describe the solution you'd like Create a new mode for the topo clustering that allows it to used Δx and Δy to define which hits in adjacent layers are neighbors to one another. Add new parameters as appropriate. Also, have this mode be used for both the ZDC and the calorimeter insert.
Describe alternatives you've considered none
Additional context N/A