Type of the registry

[haithamabaza]

In the registry json schema, the type attribute is described as the primary type of the registry. However, in Erdri.dor, a registry can have multiple types without a way to know which one is the primary. How can these types be then represented based on such a schema?

[simonjupp]

Resources can have multiple types. Can you define all the types you have in Erdri? We could follow schema.org here and allow additional types https://schema.org/additionalType to be asserted.

[ggursel]

Epidemiology Clinical Registry Basic Research Pharmacological Research Patient Registry Healthcare planning Economic evaluation Other type

[haithamabaza]

The problem is in Erdri there is no way to know which one is the primary type

[simonjupp]

Is everything in Erdri a patient registry? If yes, then that is your primary type. Otherwise we can introduce a more generic type like "rare disease data registry" that you can use as a primary type for everything. Then you can represent any more specific types with additionalType.

[ana-rath-orphanet]

My understanding is that in ERDRI the primary the is Patient registry the others being n different aims for which the patient registry is set up . However, I wonder if, looking forward for other types of « resources » we don’t need to have primary, secondary and tertiary in the schema, to accommodate other resources that are not patient registry?

Ana

Le 29 août 2019 à 17:16, Simon Jupp notifications@github.com a écrit :

Is everything in Erdri a patient registry? In which case that is your primary type. Otherwise we can introduce a more generic type like "rare disease data registry" that you can use as a primary type for everything. Then you can represent any more specific types with additionalType.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ejp-rd-vp/resource-metadata-schema/issues/17?email_source=notifications&email_token=AKLLIYE5TDHJJ6TPYPQG6TDQG7R3FA5CNFSM4INSIMF2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD5O2XDA#issuecomment-526232460, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKLLIYC5WAYG4KKFQ3C7FXDQG7R3FANCNFSM4INSIMFQ.

Dr.Ana Rath Directrice / Director Inserm US14 - Orphanet

Coordinator of RD-ACTION, European Joint Action on Rare Diseases 2015-2018 Coordinator of HIPBI-RD - Harmonizing information on phenomics for a better interoperability in the rare diseases field Member of the Revision Steering Committee of the WHO's International Classification of Diseases (ICD11) Scientific coordinator of Support-IRDiRC, Scientific secretariat of the International Rare Diseases Research Consortium

Phone number: +33 (0)1 56 53 81 37 Direct line: +33 (0)1 56 53 81 47 Mobile : +33 (0)6 09 73 55 83 email: ana.rath@inserm.fr

www.orpha.net www.orphadata.org www.rd-action.eu www.irdirc.org

[ggursel]

The Problem is, a registry in ERDRI can be either/multiple of

Epidemiology Clinical Registry Basic Research Pharmacological Research Patient Registry Healthcare planning Economic evaluation Other type . But what Haitham says is, there is no primary one.

[ggursel]

Here is the registry adding interface.

[rajaram5]

@simonjupp If you combine both issues 17 and 13 then, you can use dcat:theme as a tagging property of a resource. In ERDRI case they can use generic type like 'ejp:rare_disease_data_registry' and add other types as dcat:theme. But this solution forces us to change the use of dcat:theme property. In the current version of the schema we use it only for describing disease.

[henrietteharmse]

No longer applicable