Closed yws-ss closed 1 year ago
Not sure it related with https://github.com/awslabs/amazon-eks-ami/issues/873 or not
@yws-ss, This is indeed a bug. While eksctl does generate a file with the contents of kubeletExtraConfig
, it isn't used or being passed to the kubelet. We've added this to our backlog and will work on it soon.
Not sure it related with https://github.com/awslabs/amazon-eks-ami/issues/873 or not
I believe this was created to help add support for kubeletExtraConfig
in managed nodegroups.
@cPu1 , as this could not be fixed as soon as possible, should we add some note or modify the eksctl doc to bring this to user.
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 5 days with no activity.
What were you trying to accomplish?
Create a self-managed node group with custom AMI. Also, configure the kubeletReserved/SystemReserved through KubeletExtraConfig
What happened?
According to new announcement, eksctl decided to remove the eksctl's bootstrap script for custom AMI with node group. Therefore, in order to early adopt this change, we follow the guideline to add overrideBootstrapCommand. Following is my current YAML:
However, we found that this behavior would lead the KubeletExtraConfig doesn't merge the extra configuration into kubelet config which EKS Optimized AMI already contain. Which mean, the configuration wouldn't effect.
How to reproduce it?
Create a node group with above YAML configuration.
Logs
Anything else we need to know?
Versions