This is one fix for the errors reported during the travis tests. We might want to wrap this try...except in a function that is defined once, and then called as conf = supy.getConfiguration()?
Davide
P.S. alternatively, we could move the testing to the minimal-example repo, where configuration is defined. However, I believe it makes sense to keep the two things separated (we could have two tests, one to check the supy internal consistency, and one for the minimal-example)...need to think more about this.
Hi Burt and Ted,
This is one fix for the errors reported during the travis tests. We might want to wrap this
try...except
in a function that is defined once, and then called asconf = supy.getConfiguration()
?Davide
P.S. alternatively, we could move the testing to the
minimal-example
repo, whereconfiguration
is defined. However, I believe it makes sense to keep the two things separated (we could have two tests, one to check the supy internal consistency, and one for the minimal-example)...need to think more about this.