Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Posting output of apache2ctl -M as requested on discussion list:
core_module (static)
log_config_module (static)
logio_module (static)
mpm_prefork_module (static)
http_module (static)
so_module (static)
auth_pgsql_module (shared)
alias_module (shared)
auth_basic_module (shared)
authn_dbd_module (shared)
authn_file_module (shared)
authz_default_module (shared)
authz_groupfile_module (shared)
authz_host_module (shared)
authz_user_module (shared)
autoindex_module (shared)
cgi_module (shared)
deflate_module (shared)
dir_module (shared)
env_module (shared)
expires_module (shared)
headers_module (shared)
include_module (shared)
mime_module (shared)
negotiation_module (shared)
php5_module (shared)
proxy_module (shared)
proxy_http_module (shared)
python_module (shared)
reqtimeout_module (shared)
rewrite_module (shared)
setenvif_module (shared)
spdy_module (shared)
ssl_module (shared)
status_module (shared)
[I ended up disabling mod_spdy due to issues with my php install]
Original comment by vanch...@gmail.com
on 28 Apr 2012 at 10:09
I note that you seem to be using mod_php with mod_spdy, which can cause
problems due to PHP's lack of thread safety (the same problem comes up when
using mod_php with Apache Worker rather than Apache Prefork).
See here for some information on how to configure Apache to use PHP safely with
mod_spdy: https://developers.google.com/speed/spdy/mod_spdy/php
Original comment by mdste...@google.com
on 2 May 2012 at 8:13
I have same warning combining mod_fcgi and apache-worker-mpm.
This doesn't occur with prefork and fcgi.
Is worker-mpm not supported by mod_spdy?
Couldn't find anything about the worker-mpm support in the docs.
(Just the fact, that it is a similar thread model to mod_spdy)
Original comment by in.gottw...@gmail.com
on 4 May 2012 at 7:19
Hmm, that is very interesting to know, thank you. In general, mod_spdy should
definitely be compatible with worker-mpm (in fact, most of the mod_spdy testing
I do is on worker). Strange that the warning shows up for you with worker but
not prefork.
Other than getting this warning, does everything else work fine when you use
mod_spdy with fcgid/worker, or are you seeing any other misbehavior?
I _think_ this warning should be harmless (other than filling up the logs,
which is obviously an issue), but despite my efforts I have yet to be able to
reproduce it locally, even though I know a number of folks are seeing it. I'll
keep working on it.
Original comment by mdste...@google.com
on 4 May 2012 at 2:43
I believe this should be fixed in trunk as of r323.
Original comment by mdste...@google.com
on 15 May 2012 at 2:09
Original comment by mdste...@google.com
on 15 May 2012 at 2:09
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mdste...@google.com
on 19 Apr 2012 at 9:16