We should double check the code for parsing and converting these values. Based on various IETF discussions it sounds like the field may not be actually populated with the date. There's also this draft: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathewson-no-gmtunixtime-00.txt At a minimum we should add something to the documentation of these fields to explain this and prevent confusion.
We should double check the code for parsing and converting these values. Based on various IETF discussions it sounds like the field may not be actually populated with the date. There's also this draft: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathewson-no-gmtunixtime-00.txt At a minimum we should add something to the documentation of these fields to explain this and prevent confusion.