Structure code between InfraOps and SecOps

[XavierM]

In EAH, we decide that will work in the same folder. To re-open the discussion and finalyze the answer, I am creating an issue, se we can discuss how we would like our code to be structure so we can work together without walking on each other toes. Please advice or offer your own, so we can start our secops app ;)

That's how the code is structure as today:

• Infra

  • common
  • docs
  • node_modules
  • public
  • apps
  • components
  • containers
  • images
  • lib
  • pages
  • store
  • utils
  • scripts
  • server
  • types

  What it can be:

• Ingest
  • common
  • docs
  • node_modules
  • public
  • apps
  • components (that will be share between the two apps)
  • lib
  • infra
    • components
    • containers
    • images
    • pages
    • store
  • SecOps
    • components
    • containers
    • images
    • pages
    • store
  • store (I think it will be nice to have a common store if we need to switch user between apps)
  • utils
  • scripts
  • server
  • types

[skh]

• While we're at it, can we rename infra to InfraOps?
• Do we want to map the folder structure to the Kibana menu (which would mean Logs gets its own folder) or redux store structure, or anything else?

[XavierM]

Also, for the server side, I did not want to create a substructure because I wanted to be more like a generic API and not guided by infra_ops or sec_ops but more by the needs of metrics/networks/hosts/ etc Does that make sense?

[weltenwort]

I agree with what @skh said, but looks reasonable on general. If/how we reflect the structure in the store(s) needs some more thought on my side before I can voice an opinion.

[XavierM]

@weltenwort maybe, for now, we do not need to have a common store and we will see if we get a feature later on where we need a common a store between our two applications.

I was more thinking to do something like that https://redux.js.org/recipes/isolatingsubapps for now and see how it goes.

[weltenwort]

yes, not much risk in going that route first. if you intend to go with redux at all - have you already settled on that?

[tsg]

I think we can close this one, right? Reopen if you left it open intentionally.