Open michaelbaamonde opened 3 years ago
It's also worth considering renaming the parameter to target. This would be a breaking change, however, so there's a cost-benefit analysis to be done. Curious what others think.
I'm in favor of renaming, especially considering https://github.com/elastic/rally/issues/1359 we should aim for a consistent terminology. Renaming is usually not much of a problem because we can support both names for a grace period and emit a warning if the deprecated name is used.
The
cluster-health
operation accepts an optionalindex
parameter. This seems to map to what the Elasticsearch documentation refers to as thetarget
of the health check:So, it appears that the
index
parameter in Rally'scluster-health
operation implicitly accepts data streams. We should at least clarify this in the docs in the short term.It's also worth considering renaming the parameter to
target
. This would be a breaking change, however, so there's a cost-benefit analysis to be done. Curious what others think.