Closed scalp42 closed 6 years ago
I came here to open an issue asking exactly the same. Found it already opened and I still have no idea what the author meant with that phrase.
Might be worth pinging @elasticdog
This just means that the smudge/clean filter method of encrypting files isn't terribly efficient since it forks processes for each individual file that you want to keep secure. Any method of encrypting the entire repository (like full disk encryption, encrypted disk images, git-remote-gcrypt, git-annex encrypted remote, etc.) would work better if you want to keep the entire thing secure. It's a much different use case than the one that transcrypt tries to solve.
Keybase also now supports encrypted git repository hosting, which would work well for some circumstances.
Anyway, I'll close this issue out, as I don't know if I want to maintain a list of alternatives in the repository itself. If this question comes up a lot more and people aren't satisfied being pointed here, I can reconsider.
Regarding the statement:
Any chance you could give some examples of what you're referring to?
Thanks!