Now that we have an int index, we may drop _pset_seq as this is the same as df.index. _pset_seq is set to NaN for parallel runs in run_local() because of random execution order (there's a not too complicated fix, but we didn't have the use case), which is not ideal. So far its only real use case is in prep_batch(), where we use it to enumerate psets in run_{machine.name}.sh, but also only in a comment as a convenience feature.
Now that we have an int index, we may drop
_pset_seq
as this is the same asdf.index
._pset_seq
is set to NaN for parallel runs inrun_local()
because of random execution order (there's a not too complicated fix, but we didn't have the use case), which is not ideal. So far its only real use case is inprep_batch()
, where we use it to enumerate psets inrun_{machine.name}.sh
, but also only in a comment as a convenience feature.