Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I think i posted in the wrong section haha silly me, posted in wiki as opposed
to here on issues doi! ;) But yeah i see what ya getting at dude, i thought the
same thing!!
Comment by ObiDanKinobi, Yesterday (22 hours ago)
Hi guys/gals. Just wanted to say fantastic work you are doing with this
program, just recently downloaded the latest version (0.7.2), and it seems to
work fine. I have 1 suggestion and 1 query though, if i may.
The suggestion is this.....Rather than have both regular map and satellite
imagery purged into a different tile type 'hybrid'. Would it not be possible
for the gui to link to both the sat tile libraries and the map tile libraries,
thus negating the need to download a new form of data 'hybrid'.
It would make sense to only require 2 data sources to create 3 colours to to
speak, rather than 3 for 3 as it would reduce the amount of data overhead
required.
Also you have four options (well differential ones at least ;) when off-line...
*Edit (None + None, Map + Sat (Hybrid), None + Sat, None + Map)
By utilizing 'hybrid' tiles you are reducing options available in a sense, as
if one has downloaded only 'hybrid' tiles and not the relevent map or sat tiles
they cannot, switch to 'map only' or 'sat only', if offline. A minor
inconvenience perhaps, but thought i would make the suggestion anyways.
With regard to my question, i was wondering if you could tell me what the quota
for satellite imagery files is roughly, as i appeared to be getting a few 404
errors when downloading. As an after-thought are the hybrid tiles subject to
the same quotas?
Thanks for your time, and keep up the most righteous good work dudes/dudettes!!!
- Dan Kinobi
Original comment by ObiDanKi...@googlemail.com
on 21 Jul 2010 at 4:34
P.s i'm lazy though and those issue type form/templates look too troublesome
for me =P. Thanks for bringing this issue to light prasenji ;). I shall try to
move my ideas over to here if thats cool, i wasn't sure if you needed to like
o.k it with the dudes in charge first before making suggestions man. =P
-Jean Claude Van Dan.
Original comment by ObiDanKi...@googlemail.com
on 21 Jul 2010 at 4:39
Sorry but I don't think that's a good idea.
If we do that satellite and hybrid will be the same, we will be confusing users thinking they have hybrid view when they really don't, if user wants to see satellite images they can select the satellite option.
Original comment by heldersepu
on 21 Jul 2010 at 4:55
The suggestion from ObiDan is not clear to me, we need to download hybrid tiles
because those are images with transparency.
Maybe here is the answer to the quota question:
http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/staticmaps/#Limits
Original comment by heldersepu
on 21 Jul 2010 at 5:02
O.k so you have map tiles and you have sat tiles, now all that hybrid tiles are
(in my humble understanding) is a slightly transparent 'map' tile over the top
of a 'satellite' tile.
O.k so i was saying rather than having to essentially download 3 different file
types, sat,map and hybrid, instead if it was possible to use your program, to
introduce transparency to the map tile and then link and layer it over the
corresponding satellite image. If you could do this procedure within the
program itself, it would negate the need to download a third data type
'hybrid', as well as keeping various options (i.e map only, sat only, or
hybrid), available to the user.
This would reduce overhead data costs/amounts by approximately 1/3 (assuming
all tiles are the same size, which i am fully aware they are not;)as one would
need to only download 2 data libraries as opposed to 3.
A simple analogy would be the program is the palette and 'sat' is red and 'map'
is blue.
Rather than having to spend extra to buy a purple (hybrid), if you mixed the 2
colours you could instead create a purple (hybrid) of your own.
This is of course assuming there is a possibility to somehow alter the 'map'
tile to be transparent as part of the program code. Haha maybe its a bit
complicated actually, but if you managed to get it working, it would
drastically reduce data that needs to be downloaded..
Hope this helps explain what i meant =)
- Dan
Original comment by ObiDanKi...@googlemail.com
on 21 Jul 2010 at 11:11
it looks as though there are 2 different matters being raised here
1 as for 'parsing' the map into its data points then remapping it as an
overlay, well aside from the fact that that's a vast amount of work, it would
in most cases be against the map services' terms - that I've recently had cause
to look at closely :-)
for the map service that allows creation of maps from data, see
http://code.google.com/p/gmapcatcher/issues/detail?id=183
2 as for the OP's suggestion, it would be possible; although my own view is
that the absence of viewable tiles in hybrid mode is the right behaviour, so
you then change to sat mode to see the sat layer; an alternative would be a
generic transparent 'missing overlay' image perhaps; no-one's stopping you from
coding it, prasenjit :-)
Original comment by Mark111...@gmail.com
on 25 Jul 2010 at 5:20
Original comment by heldersepu
on 13 Oct 2011 at 8:52
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
prasenji...@gmail.com
on 21 Jul 2010 at 5:03