Closed corradio closed 6 years ago
As usual, I could find the missing ones on http://portalweb.cammesa.com/memnet1/revistas/estacional/base_gen.html and would map them to their types by the first column.
Maybe we should think about a general improvement here. There will be a lot of new renewable power in the future according to this article, and from what we experienced in the past, some new gas PPs were / are connected to the grid and metered and reported.
There is a clear pattern behind the power plant IDs: In general, everything that ends with "TG" before the numeric part is a gas turbine and should be running on natural gas as main fuel (e.g. ABCDTG01) Actually, the plant mapping in the AR.py could be entirely dismissed, when only the the fourth and fifth letter of the plant IDs will be considered.
In line with 1.), the mapping could be refined and updated by using the first column on http://portalweb.cammesa.com/memnet1/revistas/estacional/base_gen.html for all of the existing power plants.
These two options would eliminate/limit this issue that pops up every once in a while when a new unit (or previously unused unit) suddenly enters operation.
I went through the mapping in the parser and found some errors as well, like "EO" wind power plants and "FV" solar power plants recently being mapped to "hydro". Probably because they are included in the page with hydro generation data, which needs a fix anyway.
Are you guys able to revise wind and solar easily for the past from the data? Would be nice to see the behaviour to prove this assumption. Else I could download some recent data from the hydro section.