The open source repository for Electricity Maps App and data parsers that enables a real-time visualisation of the CO2 emissions of electricity consumption
The installed capacity of nuclear (9.1 GW) in Sweden is too high. Reactor Ringhals 2 was permanently shut down around new years, and the remaining reactors' effects are:
That totals 7 751 MW or 7 801 MW depending on which number of O3 is correct. A fair bit less than 9.1 GW.
(Also wind installed effect for Sweden is too low, but I don't have any source for a correct number there. Just that production has been far above 6.12 GW a couple of times the last windy weeks. Example: 16 Feb 2020)
The installed capacity of nuclear (9.1 GW) in Sweden is too high. Reactor Ringhals 2 was permanently shut down around new years, and the remaining reactors' effects are:
Ringhals 1: 881 MW Ringhals 3: 1 063 MW Ringhals 4: 1 130 MW (source: https://group.vattenfall.com/se/var-verksamhet/ringhals/produktion )
Oskarshamn 3: 1 450 MW or 1 400 MW ( https://www.okg.se/sv/Produktionsinformation/ and https://www.okg.se/sv/Om-OKG/ or https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskarshamns_kärnkraftverk#Oskarshamn_3 )
Forsmark 1: 990 MW Forsmark 2: 1 120 MW Forsmark 3: 1 167 MW ( https://group.vattenfall.com/se/var-verksamhet/forsmark/produktion )
That totals 7 751 MW or 7 801 MW depending on which number of O3 is correct. A fair bit less than 9.1 GW.
(Also wind installed effect for Sweden is too low, but I don't have any source for a correct number there. Just that production has been far above 6.12 GW a couple of times the last windy weeks. Example: 16 Feb 2020)