Closed brunolajoie closed 7 years ago
I don't understand you point. We use gCO2eq/kWh, so if a plant is not producing, the value is 0. Since no kWh are produced.
If we were counting gCO2eq/h or gCO2eq/y, then maybe we could say that idle plants are still emitting some CO2, but still it does not seem particularly true.
The values we use from IPCC are a good compromise between showing only marginal (fuel) and showing total LCE. Unless you believe we should only show emissions for the operational part?
After giving it a second thought, I think you are right. It seems a good compromise, which, anyway, might not change drastically the relative emission intensity of each countries.
Should we keep the issue open then?
Unless you believe we should only show emissions for the operational part?
Is this something that has been considered? Having a marginal/LC toggle would allow users to decide (but maybe that is too confusing).
@brunolajoie is this still being considered? I recommend closing if we do not plan to work on this in the near future
Not in the near future indeed!
Currently, CO2 intensity figures by power plant (in gCO2eq/kWh) that we use are lifecycle emission factors, so that emission embedded in the manufacturing of the plant are taken into account. Therefore, we should not assign the value 0 to the CO2 intensity of a power plant that is not producing - instead one should divide lifecycle emissions figures between the operational part (related to fuel) and the manufacturing & installation part, in order to correct our real-time emissions figure accordingly.
Current lifecycle dataset does not differentiate Operational from Manufacturing emission intensity and comes from "IPCC Working Group III – Mitigation of Climate Change, Annex III: Technology - specific cost and performance parameters" (PDF). IPCC. 2014. p. 10. Retrieved 1 August 2014.