`vite-plugin-electron` vs `vite-electron-plugin`

[caoxiemeihao]

vite-plugin-electron vs vite-electron-plugin

1. They are both very simple. Just a simple configuration of the entry file is all that is needed.
2. They both listen for changes to the file and execute electron . command to start or restart the Electron App.

• vite-plugin-electron uses Vite builds such as Main-Process, Preload-Scripts, which are based on the build API provided by Vite, which means it works well with all of Vite's ecosystems.
• vite-electron-plugin is much faster(Not Bundle), it is only based on esbuild to convert .ts files, so it has very high performance. It has a plugin system that references Vite's implementation, but is not compatible with Vite's plugins.

---

关于 vite-plugin-electron 与 vite-electron-plugin

1. 它们都很简单。只是简单的配置入口文件即可。
2. 它们都是监听了文件的变化，当文件被构建完成或重新构建时执行 electron . 启动或重启 Electron App。

• vite-plugin-electron 使用 Vite 构建诸如 Main-Process、Preload-Scripts 它们都基于 Vite 提供的 build API。也就是说它能够很好的使用 Vite 的所有生态。
• vite-electron-plugin 更加的快(单文件编译)，它仅仅是基于 esbuild 转换 ts 文件，所以它具有非常高的性能。它具有一套参考 Vite 实现的插件系统，但不兼容 Vite 的插件。

[vindecodex]

Why vite-plugin-electron unable to process vitest integration with playwright ? while vite-electron-plugin works very well ?

[caoxiemeihao]

It's embarrassing, I don't know how to use vitest and playwright yet. 😅

Why vite-plugin-electron unable to process vitest integration with playwright ? while vite-electron-plugin works very well ?

@vindecodex Can you provide a minimal Demo?