Open elementaryBot opened 7 years ago
You are right, that is wishlist :)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Darcy Brás da Silva <
We use Launchpad ones:http://i.imgur.com/I15LH.png
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Darcy Brás da Silva <
Additionally, I add the following criteria when I mark importance:
Critical: This is probably a crasher. This problem makes the app completely unusable and is an emergency.
Low: This is an annoyance, but it does not prevent a user from using the app. Likely a "papercut" or small visual design issue.
Wishlist: This is not a problem with existing features, this is an enhancement or a new feature.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:16 PM, David Gomes
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Darcy Brás da Silva
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:55 +0100, David Gomes wrote:
You are right, that is wishlist :)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Darcy Brás da Silva
wrote: Is this really low priority ? What are the metrics on raking bug_report priority? I was just searching for a blueprint after reading getting the notice it was set as low, and found this https://blueprints.launchpad.net/pantheon-terminal/+spec/background-execution which apparently ranks it differently. On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 10:27 +0000, David Gomes wrote: > ** Changed in: pantheon-terminal > Milestone: None => 0.2 > > ** Changed in: pantheon-terminal > Status: New => Confirmed > > ** Changed in: pantheon-terminal > Importance: Undecided => Low > -- Darcy Brás da Silva -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community Post to : Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Darcy Brás da Silva
Launchpad Details: #LPC Daniel Fore - 2012-09-17 19:23:05 +0000
Dan: +1 that's pretty much exactly what I use too.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Darcy Brás da Silva <
Also where we are in the milestone (nearing release) factors in too, right now certain things are more likely to have a lower priority than if we were working on Luna+1.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Cody Garver
Dan: +1 that's pretty much exactly what I use too.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Darcy Brás da Silva <
> wrote: > Another note on this, I'm not talking about `status' , but rather about > _Importance_ . > > So the answer "You are right, that is whishlist" doesn't make any sense > to me :/ > > On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 20:16 +0100, David Gomes wrote: > > We use Launchpad ones:http://i.imgur.com/I15LH.png > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Darcy Brás da Silva > > wrote: > > Problem is i still don't know what metric is used to determine > > it's > > importance. > > Or is just, oh i feel I'm in a bad mood and this looks bad, > > critical ? > > I think it's important to have rules when evaluating bug > > reports, only > > that way we can accurately pay attention to the importance > > when fixing > > bugs. > > > > On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:55 +0100, David Gomes wrote: > > > You are right, that is wishlist :) > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Darcy Brás da Silva > > > wrote: > > > Is this really low priority ? > > > What are the metrics on raking bug_report priority? > > I was just > > > searching > > > for a blueprint after reading getting the notice it > > was set as > > > low, and > > > found this > > > > > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/pantheon-terminal/+spec/background-execution > > > > > > which apparently ranks it differently. > > > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 10:27 +0000, David Gomes > > wrote: > > > > ** Changed in: pantheon-terminal > > > > Milestone: None => 0.2 > > > > > > > > ** Changed in: pantheon-terminal > > > > Status: New => Confirmed > > > > > > > > ** Changed in: pantheon-terminal > > > > Importance: Undecided => Low > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Darcy Brás da Silva > > > > > > -- > > > Mailing list: > > https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community > > > Post to : > > > > > Unsubscribe : > > https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community > > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Darcy Brás da Silva > > > > > > -- > Darcy Brás da Silva > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community > Post to : > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- Cody Garver
-- Cody Garver
Launchpad Details: #LPC Cody Garver - 2012-09-17 19:50:28 +0000
Still a valid issue. We should either issue the warning or just bring that stopped task back up when you reopen Terminal (personally I'm a fan of the latter)
Launchpad Details: #LPC Daniel Fore - 2015-05-02 00:09:36 +0000
We should either issue the warning or just bring that stopped task back up when you reopen Terminal (personally I'm a fan of the latter)
In case such jobs have already been restarted in the background (e.g. using bg
), another option could be to silently disown
the job before closing Terminal, so that the job isn't killed. But a warning could still be warranted, since the output from that job would then be lost (AFAIK).
It's easy to suspend Ctrl+Z a task, and forget about it, In such scenarios closing the terminal should result in a warning, confirming if the user really wants to close and kill the background tasks.
Launchpad Details: #LP1050321 Darcy Luís Neves Brás da Silva - 2012-09-13 09:53:24 +0000