The current default format string is good advertising for the crate, but more or less requires that I change it, and then I'm repeating the name of the function twice, once for the fn declaration, and once in the format string. Having the default format string be the function name instead would make it more useful by default in my opinion.
Yes.
That wasn't to advertise the crate, It was to help me distinguish the logs that came from the macro from other logs, but now that I published it I need to change it.
I'll do something like fn foo() => {:?}
The current default format string is good advertising for the crate, but more or less requires that I change it, and then I'm repeating the name of the function twice, once for the
fn
declaration, and once in the format string. Having the default format string be the function name instead would make it more useful by default in my opinion.