Closed gnott closed 6 years ago
Hi Graham
I am happy with this, and I am not sure it's worth versioning the files for PoA.
@JGilbert-eLife do you have any opinion on this?
We've never had any complaints so I am inclined to spend our effort elsewhere.
M
In the refactored code in the new package-poa project at https://github.com/elifesciences/package-poa, the file names for data supplement files as well as the zip file name (and PDF file name) themselves are configurable using a file name pattern. eLife can use the elife naming pattern, and potentially the file names can be changed for other users.
A question for you please @Melissa37: below is an example of the digital supplement file names of the files found inside the
"ds.zip"
file. There is no change so far - it has been like this for years - although I wanted to check and see if you would like to name the files differentlyThe process is basically it reads in the EJP
manifest.xml
file, gets the title of each file and uses a formatted title, andelife_poa_e12717
is added to the start of the name.I was wondering if you care for changing this at all at this stage.
One idea I was thinking is to make it aware of an article version, if supplied to it when it repackages, so the internal files could have names that include the version number, and use hypens instead of underscores, etc.