Closed gnott closed 9 years ago
Hi there
I have just checked the PubMed validation tool and it works with
and with no abstract tagging present.
Was the error in the AWS workflow? or at PubMed?
Could we use the boxed text supplied to HW as the abstract text supplied to PubMed? ie the text of the correction is the abstract when sent to PubMed?
PubMed initially publish them as we supply them, then later they manually link them up to the article and remove the correction as a separate PubMed entry. We need to send them to PubMed to get them on their system.
article-type="correction"
Looking at 04741, the <boxed-text>
only contains the title of the article and the authors, and these are already present in the submission. The copy following it has multiple <p>
paragraphs, which would need to be removed in order to squeeze it into an abstract.
I recommend we submit a blank abstract for correction articles for now. This just requires a small fix to not fail due to error and deploy it.
Cool, but lets leave this for an enhancement later.
Due to missing an
<abstract>
, a correction type article caused an error.To ignore the abstract when empty is an easy fix, but I'd like to confirm if any additional data should be sent to Pubmed.
E.g. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=10.7554%2FeLife.03521
I think the linkout links are not provided for these historical correction articles either.