Closed gnott closed 7 years ago
I have an email exchange out with Andy because PubMed do not account for on-behalf-of but reading between the lines they would treat it as an author, as long as the "groups" contribution was valid.
Just confirmed with Andy- should be treated as a group author.
Thanks! M
I'm trying to add an on-behalf-of
value as a group. It looks like if there is a <Group><GroupName>
then it requires an <IndividualName>
. That would require at a minimum a <LastName>
I think. We could add the on-behalf-of value as both the GroupName and the LastName in order to create a valid deposit.
Is that sounding ok, or does the inclusion of on-behalf-of need more analysis?
Hi there
No more analysis needed, that's perfect.
Thanks M
It looks like the compatible way and best looking result is to produce this
<Group>
<GroupName>for the eLife Staff Team</GroupName>
<IndividualName>
<FirstName EmptyYN="Y"/>
<LastName>for the eLife Staff Team</LastName>
</IndividualName>
</Group>
On Pubmed it will end up looking like this under the Collaborators list
Building tests for the new kitchen sink XML, I see in the article XML there is an
<on-behalf-of>
tag,@Melissa37 are you able to comment further of whether this value would be included in a PubMed deposit?
There's just a brief mention of on-behalf-of in issue https://github.com/elifesciences/elife-pubmed-feed/issues/7 from long ago about group authors.