Open Melissa37 opened 5 years ago
I'm seeing in the input XML for what I think is an Insight article has empty tags for the editor records, I assume they can be ignored:
<contrib-group content-type="section">
<contrib contrib-type="assoc_ed" id="author-">
<name>
<surname/>
<given-names/>
</name>
<role>Reviewing Editor</role>
<aff>
<institution/>
<country/>
</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<contrib-group content-type="section">
<contrib contrib-type="editor" id="author-">
<name>
<surname/>
<given-names/>
</name>
<role>Senior Editor</role>
<aff>
<institution/>
<country/>
</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
Hi @gnott Feature content will have a whole load of their own tickets! For research articles I think this should never be empty and so this is something we'd need validation on.
Problem / Motivation
WHO: Production/Bot/Production Vendor WHEN: Between Export from EJP/xPub and delivery to production vendor WHERE: In eLife bot processes WHAT: Senior editor details WHY: Differences between EJP output and final XML (EJP could not match our requirements exactly)
Proposed solution
Output from ejp:
<contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="assoc_ed" id="author-24218"><name><surname>Frank</surname><given-names>Michael j.</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>Brown University</institution><country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group>
Final XML:
<contrib-group content-type="section">
...<contrib contrib-type="editor" id="author-10"><name><surname>Collings</surname><given-names>Andy</given-names></name><role>Reviewing Editor</role><aff><institution>eLife Sciences</institution><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group>
Differences: EJP @contrib-type is"assoc_ed"; final XML is "editor"
Clarification needed and assumptions
Tasks
Technical notes
@gnott
User interface / Wireframes
NA