elifesciences / publish-reviewed-preprints-issues

MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

MSID: 96519 Version: 2 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.25.577216 #1004

Closed fred-atherden closed 1 month ago

fred-atherden commented 2 months ago

MSID: 96519

Version: 2

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.25.577216

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

Useful links:

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

elife-bot commented 2 months ago
error: [journal-ref-article-title] This journal reference (id sc23) has no article-title element.
error: [book-ref-source] This book reference (id sc32) has no source element.
error: [book-ref-source] This book reference (id sc39) has no source element.
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c20) has untagged textual content - e569 (. Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c22) has untagged textual content - e1217 (. Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id sc3) has untagged textual content - ; discussion 278-284 (. Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [mixed-citation-person-group-flag-2] mixed-citation in reference (id=c2) does not have an author person-group. Is that correct?
info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.2.
warning: [article-corresp] The number of corresponding authors and distinct emails is the same, but a match between them has been unable to be made. As its stands the corresp will display on EPP: #geissmaf@mskcc.org; vicarior@mskcc.org.