elifesciences / publish-reviewed-preprints-issues

MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

MSID: 96184 Version: 2 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.04.574263 #1041

Open fred-atherden opened 1 month ago

fred-atherden commented 1 month ago

MSID: 96184

Version: 2

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.04.574263

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

Useful links:

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

elife-bot commented 5 days ago
- error: [journal-ref-article-title] This journal reference (id c23) has no article-title element.
- error: [journal-ref-article-title] This journal reference (id c91) has no article-title element.
! warning: [aff-no-country] Affiliation does not contain a country element: 1Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c9) has untagged textual content - ), Article 3. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c23) has untagged textual content - ). bioRxiv. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c27) has untagged textual content - ), giab008. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c28) has untagged textual content - ), Article 7834. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c29) has untagged textual content - , B. (; ), evab152. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c31) has untagged textual content - ), msac122. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c40) has untagged textual content - ), Article 2. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c51) has untagged textual content - ), Article 1. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c74) has untagged textual content - ), Article 9. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c79) has untagged textual content - ), msac131. . Is it tagged correctly?
+ info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.2.
! warning: [ext-link-text] The text for a URL is '(http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03708.001' (which looks like a URL), but it is not the same as the actual embedded link, which is 'http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03708.001'. https://elifeproduction.slab.com/posts/general-layout-and-formatting-wq0m31at#hyyhg-ext-link-text
! warning: [ext-link-text] The text for a URL is '(https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020104858' (which looks like a URL), but it is not the same as the actual embedded link, which is 'https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020104858'. https://elifeproduction.slab.com/posts/general-layout-and-formatting-wq0m31at#hyyhg-ext-link-text
! warning: [ext-link-text] The text for a URL is ', https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42511-z' (which looks like a URL), but it is not the same as the actual embedded link, which is 'https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42511-z'. https://elifeproduction.slab.com/posts/general-layout-and-formatting-wq0m31at#hyyhg-ext-link-text
! warning: [ed-report-sig-kwd-presence] eLife Assessment does not have a significance keyword group. Is that correct?
fred-atherden commented 4 days ago

HI @acollings, is the lack of significance term OK here? As far as I can tell it was deliberate? (although the v1 has useful)

acollings commented 4 days ago

Thanks @fred-atherden it's very harsh but I think we should leave it. It sounds like the authors are submitting elsewhere, rather than revising again or moving forward with an eLife VOR

fred-atherden commented 4 days ago

OK thanks for confirming!