elifesciences / publish-reviewed-preprints-issues

MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

MSID: 101181 Version: 1 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.12.598701 #1085

Closed fred-atherden closed 1 month ago

fred-atherden commented 1 month ago

MSID: 101181

Version: 1

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.12.598701

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

Useful links:

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

elife-bot commented 1 month ago
error: [journal-ref-article-title] This journal reference (id c17) has no article-title element.
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c17) has untagged textual content - . Available from: . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c20) has untagged textual content - . , , , editors. ; Feb 17;. Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c5) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c11) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c13) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.2.
warning: [article-corresp] The number of corresponding authors and distinct emails is the same, but a match between them has been unable to be made. As its stands the corresp will display on EPP: *sz397@cam.ac.uk; alexandre.leitao@research.fchampalimaud.org; fmj1001@cam.ac.uk.
warning: [ed-report-kwd-group-2] evidence-strength type kwd-group has 2 keywords: Convincing; Solid. This is unusual, please check this is correct.
naushinthomson commented 1 month ago

@acollings Should convincing be removed as a keyword here?

acollings commented 1 month ago

Hi @naushinthomson yes, fixed!