MSID: 94174 Version: 2 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.28.563965

[fred-atherden]

MSID: 94174

Version: 2

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.28.563965

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

• DocMap: https://data-hub-api.elifesciences.org/enhanced-preprints/docmaps/v2/by-publisher/elife/get-by-manuscript-id?manuscript_id=94174
• New model tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_fHaoOy7hjyocptKtVJRijeNpUY4hBS7Ck_aVmx6ZJk/
• Reviews on sciety: https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2023.10.28.563965

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

• DocMap issue addressing: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNCwK6EI=/
• Explore DataHub DocMaps API: https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/4c2f0368-babb-4beb-b5b3-497e7e7b0f08/page/ejphD
• Unmatched submissions and preprints: https://lookerstudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/9f86204f-3bf7-477c-9b18-5c5ef141bf69/page/p_gxi57ha93c
• Unmatched manuscripts spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15QcK8w-ssB7109RQEDtFpJPZ0J5HTGxoHa_2TtpMBbg/edit#gid=1336081641

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

• QC preview: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/previews/94174v2
• Update ticket with any problems (add blocked label)
• When QC OK, add QC OK label to ticket and add publication date and time to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1amAlKvdLcaDp5W8Z8g77NmkwbMF5n_u89ArSqPMO8jg
• Move card to next column
• (At end of the day post link in #enhanced-preprint and ask for PDF to be generated)

Useful links:

• Preprint DOI : https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.28.563965
• Confirm reviews returned by EPP: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/api/reviewed-preprints/94174/v2/reviews
• To update the MECA path in the docmap: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mctCQuNFBjSn97Lihy7_vBO6z7-N-oqyLv4clyi6zHg

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

• Jenkins pipeline to reindex search can be triggered sooner or monitored here: https://alfred.elifesciences.org/job/process/job/process-reindex-reviewed-preprints/

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

• PDF tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/106_XeDjmuBae7gexOTNzg60lapeqjl2aRn9DzupGyS8/

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

• [ ] Kettle is on!

[elife-bot]

- error: [journal-ref-article-title] This journal reference (id c36) has no article-title element.
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c18) has untagged textual content - D482-D489. DOI:10.1093/nar/gky1114, PMID: . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c36) has untagged textual content - :15548-55. DOI: . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c39) has untagged textual content - :365-371. DOI: . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c59) has untagged textual content - 302-7. DOI: . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c60) has untagged textual content - 671-88. DOI:10.3390/genes2040671. PMID: . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c64) has untagged textual content - eabn9033. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c91) has untagged textual content - 469-88. DOI: . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c13) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
! warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c43) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
+ info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.3.
! warning: [article-email-corresp-author-count-equivalence] The number of corresponding authors (2: Marian Novotný; Klára Hlouchová) is not equal to the number of distinct email addresses (1: klara.hlouchova@natur.cuni.cz). Is this correct?
! warning: [ed-report-kwd-group-2] evidence-strength type kwd-group has 2 keywords: Compelling; Solid. This is unusual, please check this is correct.

[JGilbert-eLife]

Email addresses and present address note need fixing

[JGilbert-eLife]

@acollings - sorry, another one: please can you confirm we're OK with two evidence terms here?

[acollings]

@JGilbert-eLife urgh! Edited. Can we please update the assessment for the first version of the RP too (I've updated hypothes.is)?

[JGilbert-eLife]

Thanks @acollings; the first version should have updated automatically when I re-ran the article in Temporal.