elifesciences / publish-reviewed-preprints-issues

MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

MSID: 91425 Version: 2 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.26.559474 #1313

Open fred-atherden opened 1 week ago

fred-atherden commented 1 week ago

MSID: 91425

Version: 2

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.26.559474

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

Useful links:

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

elife-bot commented 6 days ago
- error: [journal-ref-article-title] This journal reference (id c140) has no article-title element.
- error: [journal-ref-article-title] This journal reference (id c151) has no article-title element.
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c135) has untagged textual content - ;quiz 34-57.. Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c153) has untagged textual content - . Retrieved from . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c170) has untagged textual content - . Retrieved from . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [ref-year-value-2] Ref with id c91 has a year element which does not contain a digit. Is it correct? (it's acceptable for this element to contain 'no date' or equivalent non-numerical information relating to year of publication)
+ info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.2.
! warning: [ext-link-text] The text for a URL is '. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00337' (which looks like a URL), but it is not the same as the actual embedded link, which is 'https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00337'. https://elifeproduction.slab.com/posts/general-layout-and-formatting-wq0m31at#hyyhg-ext-link-text
JGilbert-eLife commented 5 days ago

@acollings I think we need to remove the second 'important' here?

Image

acollings commented 5 days ago

Thanks @JGilbert-eLife -- agreed (and updated)

JGilbert-eLife commented 4 days ago

Cheers!