elifesciences / publish-reviewed-preprints-issues

MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

MSID: 97188 Version: 2 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.22.586242 #1359

Open fred-atherden opened 2 weeks ago

fred-atherden commented 2 weeks ago

MSID: 97188

Version: 2

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.22.586242

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

Useful links:

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

elife-bot commented 2 days ago
! warning: [aff-multiple-institution] Affiliation contains more than one institution element: Department of Physiology; University of Oxford in 2Department of Physiology, Anatomy, & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, United Kingdom
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c37) has untagged textual content - <233::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-T.. Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-source-2] Journal reference (id c4) has a source that starts with a roman numeral. Is part of the article-title captured in source? Source = I. Afferent input to the medial ventral posterior and posterior nuclei. Journal of Comparative Neurology.
! warning: [journal-source-1] Journal reference (id c57) has a source which suggests it might be a preprint - Preprint at bioRxiv. Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c47) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
+ info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.2.