MSID: 102027 Version: 1 DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.29.610377

fred-atherden commented 1 month ago

MSID: 102027

Version: 1

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.29.610377

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

DocMap: https://data-hub-api.elifesciences.org/enhanced-preprints/docmaps/v2/by-publisher/elife/get-by-manuscript-id?manuscript_id=102027
New model tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_fHaoOy7hjyocptKtVJRijeNpUY4hBS7Ck_aVmx6ZJk/
Reviews on sciety: https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2024.08.29.610377

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

DocMap issue addressing: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNCwK6EI=/
Explore DataHub DocMaps API: https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/4c2f0368-babb-4beb-b5b3-497e7e7b0f08/page/ejphD
Unmatched submissions and preprints: https://lookerstudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/9f86204f-3bf7-477c-9b18-5c5ef141bf69/page/p_gxi57ha93c
Unmatched manuscripts spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15QcK8w-ssB7109RQEDtFpJPZ0J5HTGxoHa_2TtpMBbg/edit#gid=1336081641

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

QC preview: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/previews/102027v1
Update ticket with any problems (add blocked label)
When QC OK, add QC OK label to ticket and add publication date and time to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1amAlKvdLcaDp5W8Z8g77NmkwbMF5n_u89ArSqPMO8jg
Move card to next column
(At end of the day post link in #enhanced-preprint and ask for PDF to be generated)

Useful links:

Preprint DOI : https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.29.610377
Confirm reviews returned by EPP: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/api/reviewed-preprints/102027/v1/reviews
To update the MECA path in the docmap: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mctCQuNFBjSn97Lihy7_vBO6z7-N-oqyLv4clyi6zHg

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

Jenkins pipeline to reindex search can be triggered sooner or monitored here: https://alfred.elifesciences.org/job/process/job/process-reindex-reviewed-preprints/

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

PDF tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/106_XeDjmuBae7gexOTNzg60lapeqjl2aRn9DzupGyS8/

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

[ ] Kettle is on!

elife-bot commented 3 weeks ago

! warning: [ref-year-value-2] Ref with id c69 has a year element which does not contain a digit. Is it correct? (it's acceptable for this element to contain 'no date' or equivalent non-numerical information relating to year of publication)
! warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c69) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
+ info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.1.
+ info: [permissions-info] This article is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://elifeproduction.slab.com/posts/licensing-and-copyright-rqdavyty#permissions-info

fred-atherden commented 3 weeks ago

WOS query sent

ameenanaji commented 3 weeks ago

Hi, the authors have asked if they can send us in an author response either today or on Monday, is it okay to hold until then please?

fred-atherden commented 3 weeks ago

Thanks @ameenanaji, yes that's fine. Could you also ask them to respond to our query relating to Web of Science (request for confirmation to proceed)?

ameenanaji commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @fred-atherden , thanks, and yes, I've asked them to respond to your query at their earliest convenience.

fred-atherden commented 3 weeks ago

Ace - thanks Ameena

fred-atherden commented 2 weeks ago

Hi @ameenanaji, has the author response been provided by the authors for this one yet?

They have responded to our query regarding WOS, so we're otherwise ready to proceed

ameenanaji commented 2 weeks ago

Hi @fred-atherden no not yet, I will send them a follow up email now

fred-atherden commented 1 week ago

Hi @ameenanaji, has there been any response from the authors on this one?

ameenanaji commented 1 week ago

Hi @fred-atherden , yes we have the response now, I'm just waiting on Ed Office to add this (I nudged them again this morning).

fred-atherden commented 1 week ago

Thanks

ameenanaji commented 1 week ago

Hi @fred-atherden , the provisional author response has now been added.

elife-bot commented 1 week ago

! warning: [aff-no-wrap] Affiliation doesn't have an institution-wrap element (the container for institution name and id). Is that correct?
! warning: [aff-no-wrap] Affiliation doesn't have an institution-wrap element (the container for institution name and id). Is that correct?
! warning: [aff-no-wrap] Affiliation doesn't have an institution-wrap element (the container for institution name and id). Is that correct?
! warning: [ref-year-value-2] Ref with id c69 has a year element which does not contain a digit. Is it correct? (it's acceptable for this element to contain 'no date' or equivalent non-numerical information relating to year of publication)
! warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c69) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
+ info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.1.
+ info: [permissions-info] This article is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://elifeproduction.slab.com/posts/licensing-and-copyright-rqdavyty#permissions-info

elifesciences / publish-reviewed-preprints-issues