MSID: 102550 Version: 1 DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.03.610837

[fred-atherden]

MSID: 102550

Version: 1

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.03.610837

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

• DocMap: https://data-hub-api.elifesciences.org/enhanced-preprints/docmaps/v2/by-publisher/elife/get-by-manuscript-id?manuscript_id=102550
• New model tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_fHaoOy7hjyocptKtVJRijeNpUY4hBS7Ck_aVmx6ZJk/
• Reviews on sciety: https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2024.09.03.610837

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

• DocMap issue addressing: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNCwK6EI=/
• Explore DataHub DocMaps API: https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/4c2f0368-babb-4beb-b5b3-497e7e7b0f08/page/ejphD
• Unmatched submissions and preprints: https://lookerstudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/9f86204f-3bf7-477c-9b18-5c5ef141bf69/page/p_gxi57ha93c
• Unmatched manuscripts spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15QcK8w-ssB7109RQEDtFpJPZ0J5HTGxoHa_2TtpMBbg/edit#gid=1336081641

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

• QC preview: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/previews/102550v1
• Update ticket with any problems (add blocked label)
• When QC OK, add QC OK label to ticket and add publication date and time to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1amAlKvdLcaDp5W8Z8g77NmkwbMF5n_u89ArSqPMO8jg
• Move card to next column
• (At end of the day post link in #enhanced-preprint and ask for PDF to be generated)

Useful links:

• Preprint DOI : https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.03.610837
• Confirm reviews returned by EPP: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/api/reviewed-preprints/102550/v1/reviews
• To update the MECA path in the docmap: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mctCQuNFBjSn97Lihy7_vBO6z7-N-oqyLv4clyi6zHg

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

• Jenkins pipeline to reindex search can be triggered sooner or monitored here: https://alfred.elifesciences.org/job/process/job/process-reindex-reviewed-preprints/

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

• PDF tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/106_XeDjmuBae7gexOTNzg60lapeqjl2aRn9DzupGyS8/

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

• [ ] Kettle is on!

[elife-bot]

- error: [aff-multiple-ids] Affiliation contains more than one institution-id element: https://ror.org/011jsc803; https://ror.org/01nrxwf90; https://ror.org/03zjvnn91 in 3 https://ror.org/011jsc803 https://ror.org/01nrxwf90 https://ror.org/03zjvnn91 MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
! warning: [aff-no-wrap] Affiliation doesn't have an institution-wrap element (the container for institution name and id). Is that correct?
! warning: [aff-no-wrap] Affiliation doesn't have an institution-wrap element (the container for institution name and id). Is that correct?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c5) has untagged textual content - e493 (. Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c13) has untagged textual content - e1785 (. Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S1'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S2'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S3'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S4'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S5'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S6'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S7'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S8'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S9'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S10'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S11'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S12'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S13'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S14'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S15'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary Figure S16'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary table1'. Is this correct?
! warning: [p-all-bold] Content of p element is entirely in bold - 'Supplementary table2'. Is this correct?
+ info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.1.
! warning: [article-corresp] The number of corresponding authors and distinct emails is the same, but a match between them has been unable to be made. As its stands the corresp will display on EPP: *zhaozh@bmi.ac.cn; gkudla@gmail.com; lijyjk@163.com; dearwood@sina.com.
! warning: [author-fn-5] footnote with id n2 has the fn-type 'others' which is not one of the known values (abbr; con; coi-statement; deceased; equal; financial-disclosure; presented-at; present-address; supported-by). Should it be changed to be one of the values? "Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests."
+ info: [permissions-info] This article is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://elifeproduction.slab.com/posts/licensing-and-copyright-rqdavyty#permissions-info

[fred-atherden]

WOS query sent