MSID: 102302 Version: 1 DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.04.610003

[fred-atherden]

MSID: 102302

Version: 1

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.04.610003

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

• DocMap: https://data-hub-api.elifesciences.org/enhanced-preprints/docmaps/v2/by-publisher/elife/get-by-manuscript-id?manuscript_id=102302
• New model tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_fHaoOy7hjyocptKtVJRijeNpUY4hBS7Ck_aVmx6ZJk/
• Reviews on sciety: https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2024.11.04.610003

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

• DocMap issue addressing: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNCwK6EI=/
• Explore DataHub DocMaps API: https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/4c2f0368-babb-4beb-b5b3-497e7e7b0f08/page/ejphD
• Unmatched submissions and preprints: https://lookerstudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/9f86204f-3bf7-477c-9b18-5c5ef141bf69/page/p_gxi57ha93c
• Unmatched manuscripts spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15QcK8w-ssB7109RQEDtFpJPZ0J5HTGxoHa_2TtpMBbg/edit#gid=1336081641

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

• QC preview: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/previews/102302v1
• Update ticket with any problems (add blocked label)
• When QC OK, add QC OK label to ticket and add publication date and time to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1amAlKvdLcaDp5W8Z8g77NmkwbMF5n_u89ArSqPMO8jg
• Move card to next column
• (At end of the day post link in #enhanced-preprint and ask for PDF to be generated)

Useful links:

• Preprint DOI : https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.04.610003
• Confirm reviews returned by EPP: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/api/reviewed-preprints/102302/v1/reviews
• To update the MECA path in the docmap: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mctCQuNFBjSn97Lihy7_vBO6z7-N-oqyLv4clyi6zHg

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

• Jenkins pipeline to reindex search can be triggered sooner or monitored here: https://alfred.elifesciences.org/job/process/job/process-reindex-reviewed-preprints/

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

• PDF tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/106_XeDjmuBae7gexOTNzg60lapeqjl2aRn9DzupGyS8/

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

• [ ] Kettle is on!

[elife-bot]

- error: [aff-multiple-ids] Affiliation contains more than one institution-id element: https://ror.org/00p991c53; https://ror.org/04xy45965; https://ror.org/03sfb9j07 in 1 https://ror.org/00p991c53 https://ror.org/04xy45965 https://ror.org/03sfb9j07 Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology(HUST), Wuhan, 430030, China
- error: [journal-ref-article-title] This journal reference (id c2) has no article-title element.
- error: [sub-article-title-check-3] The title of a author-comment type sub-article should be 'Author response'. This one is: None
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c1) has untagged textual content - , Jemal A. Global cancer statistics . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c2) has untagged textual content - , Jemal A. Cancer statistics, . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-source-1] Journal reference (id c15) has a source which suggests it might be a preprint - J bioRxiv. Is it tagged correctly?
+ info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.1.
+ info: [permissions-info] This article is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://elifeproduction.slab.com/posts/licensing-and-copyright-rqdavyty#permissions-info
! warning: [ed-report-str-kwd-presence] eLife Assessment does not have a strength keyword group. Is that correct?

[fred-atherden]

Hi @acollings, a couple of issues with this one:

1. The Assessment has no strength term, which I think isn't deliberate:

2. The author response heading is missing bold formatting, so just appearing as a normal para:

Please could you take a look and update if necessary?

[fred-atherden]

WOS Query sent

[acollings]

Thanks @fred-atherden that should be sorted