MSID: 97709 Version: 2 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.15.575555

fred-atherden commented 3 months ago

MSID: 97709

Version: 2

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.15.575555

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

DocMap: https://data-hub-api.elifesciences.org/enhanced-preprints/docmaps/v2/by-publisher/elife/get-by-manuscript-id?manuscript_id=97709
New model tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_fHaoOy7hjyocptKtVJRijeNpUY4hBS7Ck_aVmx6ZJk/
Reviews on sciety: https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2024.01.15.575555

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

DocMap issue addressing: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNCwK6EI=/
Explore DataHub DocMaps API: https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/4c2f0368-babb-4beb-b5b3-497e7e7b0f08/page/ejphD
Unmatched submissions and preprints: https://lookerstudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/9f86204f-3bf7-477c-9b18-5c5ef141bf69/page/p_gxi57ha93c
Unmatched manuscripts spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15QcK8w-ssB7109RQEDtFpJPZ0J5HTGxoHa_2TtpMBbg/edit#gid=1336081641

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

QC preview: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/previews/97709v2
Update ticket with any problems (add blocked label)
When QC OK, add QC OK label to ticket and add publication date and time to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1amAlKvdLcaDp5W8Z8g77NmkwbMF5n_u89ArSqPMO8jg
Move card to next column
(At end of the day post link in #enhanced-preprint and ask for PDF to be generated)

Useful links:

Preprint DOI : https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.15.575555
Confirm reviews returned by EPP: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/api/reviewed-preprints/97709/v2/reviews
To update the MECA path in the docmap: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mctCQuNFBjSn97Lihy7_vBO6z7-N-oqyLv4clyi6zHg

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

Jenkins pipeline to reindex search can be triggered sooner or monitored here: https://alfred.elifesciences.org/job/process/job/process-reindex-reviewed-preprints/

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

PDF tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/106_XeDjmuBae7gexOTNzg60lapeqjl2aRn9DzupGyS8/

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

[ ] Kettle is on!

elife-bot commented 3 weeks ago

- error: [journal-ref-article-title] This journal reference (id c48) has no article-title element.
- error: [graphic-test-6] Image file for graphic (https://i.imgur.com/EcL4Gnu.jpg) is the same as the one used for another graphic or inline-graphic.
- error: [graphic-test-6] Image file for graphic (https://i.imgur.com/MBgtUK7.jpg) is the same as the one used for another graphic or inline-graphic.
- error: [graphic-test-6] Image file for graphic (https://i.imgur.com/DF5iOML.jpg) is the same as the one used for another graphic or inline-graphic.
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c8) has untagged textual content - , eaaf4382.. Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c13) has untagged textual content - , Next Generation Therapeutics.. Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c19) has untagged textual content - , eabb5924.. Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c23) has untagged textual content - , Next Generation Therapeutics.. Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c26) has untagged textual content - , M. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c47) has untagged textual content - , October 8–10, 1997 Proceeedings. . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c48) has untagged textual content - ; Sage, . Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c61) has untagged textual content - , New constructs and expression of proteins / Sequences and topology.. Is it tagged correctly?
! warning: [ref-year-value-2] Ref with id c82 has a year element which does not contain a digit. Is it correct? (it's acceptable for this element to contain 'no date' or equivalent non-numerical information relating to year of publication)
! warning: [ref-year-value-2] Ref with id c96 has a year element which does not contain a digit. Is it correct? (it's acceptable for this element to contain 'no date' or equivalent non-numerical information relating to year of publication)
! warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c11) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
! warning: [mixed-citation-person-group-flag-2] mixed-citation in reference (id=c14) does not have an author person-group. Is that correct?
! warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c42) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
! warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c94) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
! warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c96) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
+ info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.3.
! warning: [ed-report-sig-kwd-presence] eLife Assessment does not have a significance keyword group. Is that correct?

fred-atherden commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @acollings, @KJT08, looks like we have some duplication in the author response here (for example all the images appear twice). Could you please take a look?

acollings commented 3 weeks ago

Thanks @fred-atherden I think we need @FionaBryant to take a look and advise further/fix things. Fiona, looks like a letter we updated, so hopefully we can eliminate the duplication? I don't think we should publish the author response as it stands!

fred-atherden commented 3 weeks ago

OK thanks!

KJT08 commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @fred-atherden, @acollings Sorry, I did notice that the majority of the responses were duplicated, maybe I should have queried whether all of the emailed response should have been included

FionaBryant commented 3 weeks ago

Thanks @fred-atherden and @acollings I have contacted the authors to ask them to provide an updated response document, to correspond to the latest updated Public Reviews. Sorry I didn't check this!

fred-atherden commented 3 weeks ago

(No problem - thanks Fiona!)

fred-atherden commented 2 weeks ago

Hi @FionaBryant, is there any update on this one? Thanks!

FionaBryant commented 2 weeks ago

Hi @fred-atherden unfortunately not. I followed up on the 29 Oct, but I will try again with the first author cc'd.

fred-atherden commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks!

FionaBryant commented 1 week ago

Hi @fred-atherden the updated author response for this one has been posted. Please can it be pulled through?

fred-atherden commented 1 week ago

Many thanks Fiona! I'll pull it through tomorrow when the change has filtered through

elifesciences / publish-reviewed-preprints-issues