MSID: 99971 Version: 1 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.17.594584

fred-atherden commented 1 month ago

MSID: 99971

Version: 1

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.17.594584

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

DocMap: https://data-hub-api.elifesciences.org/enhanced-preprints/docmaps/v2/by-publisher/elife/get-by-manuscript-id?manuscript_id=99971
New model tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_fHaoOy7hjyocptKtVJRijeNpUY4hBS7Ck_aVmx6ZJk/
Reviews on sciety: https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2024.05.17.594584

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

DocMap issue addressing: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNCwK6EI=/
Explore DataHub DocMaps API: https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/4c2f0368-babb-4beb-b5b3-497e7e7b0f08/page/ejphD
Unmatched submissions and preprints: https://lookerstudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/9f86204f-3bf7-477c-9b18-5c5ef141bf69/page/p_gxi57ha93c
Unmatched manuscripts spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15QcK8w-ssB7109RQEDtFpJPZ0J5HTGxoHa_2TtpMBbg/edit#gid=1336081641

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

QC preview: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/previews/99971v1
Update ticket with any problems (add blocked label)
When QC OK, add QC OK label to ticket and add publication date and time to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1amAlKvdLcaDp5W8Z8g77NmkwbMF5n_u89ArSqPMO8jg
Move card to next column
(At end of the day post link in #enhanced-preprint and ask for PDF to be generated)

Useful links:

Preprint DOI : https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.17.594584
Confirm reviews returned by EPP: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/api/reviewed-preprints/99971/v1/reviews
To update the MECA path in the docmap: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mctCQuNFBjSn97Lihy7_vBO6z7-N-oqyLv4clyi6zHg

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

Jenkins pipeline to reindex search can be triggered sooner or monitored here: https://alfred.elifesciences.org/job/process/job/process-reindex-reviewed-preprints/

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

PDF tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/106_XeDjmuBae7gexOTNzg60lapeqjl2aRn9DzupGyS8/

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

[ ] Kettle is on!

elife-bot commented 3 weeks ago

warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'AM'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'S'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'ES'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'A'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'MB'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'A'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'M'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'K'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'SF'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c1) has untagged textual content - . Mar . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c2) has untagged textual content - . Mar . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c3) has untagged textual content - . Apr . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c4) has untagged textual content - . Oct . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c5) has untagged textual content - May 27 . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c6) has untagged textual content - . Dec . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c7) has untagged textual content - . Jun . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c8) has untagged textual content - . Jul . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c9) has untagged textual content - . Aug . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c10) has untagged textual content - Feb 2 . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c11) has untagged textual content - Apr 29 ; (5)doi:. Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c13) has untagged textual content - . Sep . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c14) has untagged textual content - . Jan 28 . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c15) has untagged textual content - Mar 01 . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c18) has untagged textual content - . Nov . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c19) has untagged textual content - . Apr . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c20) has untagged textual content - . Feb . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c21) has untagged textual content - . Oct . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c22) has untagged textual content - Aug 15 . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c23) has untagged textual content - . Dec . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c24) has untagged textual content - . Jul . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c25) has untagged textual content - . Feb . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c26) has untagged textual content - . Jun . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c28) has untagged textual content - Oct 15 . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c29) has untagged textual content - Dec . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c31) has untagged textual content - Sep 15 . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c34) has untagged textual content - Nov 15 . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c35) has untagged textual content - . Nov . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c17) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
warning: [title-lower-case] Content of <title> element is entirely in lower-case case: Is that correct? 'fmo-4 is required for fmo-2-mediated longevity, stress resistance, and healthspan'
warning: [title-lower-case] Content of <title> element is entirely in lower-case case: Is that correct? 'fmo-4 is required for the health benefits of fmo-2 overexpression.'
warning: [title-lower-case] Content of <title> element is entirely in lower-case case: Is that correct? 'fmo-4 genetically interacts with calcium signaling to promote longevity and paraquat resistance'
warning: [title-lower-case] Content of <title> element is entirely in lower-case case: Is that correct? 'fmo-4 interacts with calcium signaling genes to promote longevity and paraquat resistance.'

fred-atherden commented 2 weeks ago

Hi @acollings, would it be worth tweaking the assessment here (not sure if convincing is intended to be used as part of the vocab)?

acollings commented 2 weeks ago

Hi @fred-atherden I see what you mean but I wouldn't be confident in changing this one, so I'd prefer to keep the two evidence terms in this case.

fred-atherden commented 2 weeks ago

No problem - thanks

elifesciences / publish-reviewed-preprints-issues