MSID: 90766 Version: 3 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.13.557510

fred-atherden commented 1 month ago

MSID: 90766

Version: 3

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.13.557510

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

DocMap: https://data-hub-api.elifesciences.org/enhanced-preprints/docmaps/v2/by-publisher/elife/get-by-manuscript-id?manuscript_id=90766
New model tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_fHaoOy7hjyocptKtVJRijeNpUY4hBS7Ck_aVmx6ZJk/
Reviews on sciety: https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2023.09.13.557510

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

DocMap issue addressing: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNCwK6EI=/
Explore DataHub DocMaps API: https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/4c2f0368-babb-4beb-b5b3-497e7e7b0f08/page/ejphD
Unmatched submissions and preprints: https://lookerstudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/9f86204f-3bf7-477c-9b18-5c5ef141bf69/page/p_gxi57ha93c
Unmatched manuscripts spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15QcK8w-ssB7109RQEDtFpJPZ0J5HTGxoHa_2TtpMBbg/edit#gid=1336081641

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

QC preview: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/previews/90766v3
Update ticket with any problems (add blocked label)
When QC OK, add QC OK label to ticket and add publication date and time to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1amAlKvdLcaDp5W8Z8g77NmkwbMF5n_u89ArSqPMO8jg
Move card to next column
(At end of the day post link in #enhanced-preprint and ask for PDF to be generated)

Useful links:

Preprint DOI : https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.13.557510
Confirm reviews returned by EPP: https://prod--epp.elifesciences.org/api/reviewed-preprints/90766/v3/reviews
To update the MECA path in the docmap: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mctCQuNFBjSn97Lihy7_vBO6z7-N-oqyLv4clyi6zHg

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

Jenkins pipeline to reindex search can be triggered sooner or monitored here: https://alfred.elifesciences.org/job/process/job/process-reindex-reviewed-preprints/

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

PDF tracking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/106_XeDjmuBae7gexOTNzg60lapeqjl2aRn9DzupGyS8/

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

[ ] Kettle is on!

fred-atherden commented 3 weeks ago

@FionaBryant, @acollings, it looks like the reviews for this one have been posted to the v2. There is no v3 at bioRxiv. I assume the authors are yet to post a version that equates to this submission?

acollings commented 3 weeks ago

Ah, yeah, this is a problem. @FionaBryant could you please ask the authors to post a V3 of the preprint? Thanks!

fred-atherden commented 3 weeks ago

Thanks. In the meantime, I'll move the reviews over to the (non-existent) v3 link. As it stands, the latest reviews are appearing in the v2.

elife-bot commented 3 weeks ago

No computer-file found in the docmap for version DOI 10.7554/eLife.90766.3

FionaBryant commented 3 weeks ago

Thanks @fred-atherden I've contacted the authors

fred-atherden commented 3 weeks ago

Thanks!

elife-bot commented 2 weeks ago

warning: [surname-test-5] surname doesn't begin with a capital letter - de-Miguel-Jiménez. Is this correct?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'M'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'A'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'L'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'J'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'M'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'A'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'N'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'S'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'JE'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'S'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [given-names-test-16] given-names for author is made up only of uppercase letters (and spaces) 'M'. Are they initials? Should the authors full given-names be introduced instead?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c31) has untagged textual content - , F N. . Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [journal-ref-text-content] This journal reference (id c75) has untagged textual content - :117–121. doi:. Is it tagged correctly?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c12) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c18) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.3.
warning: [article-email-corresp-author-count-equivalence] The number of corresponding authors (3: JE Pérez-Ortín; S Chávez; M Choder) is not equal to the number of distinct email addresses (1: choder@technion.ac.il). Is this correct?

fred-atherden commented 2 weeks ago

Looks like the v3 has been posted and we're ready to proceed ☝

FionaBryant commented 2 weeks ago

Yes, sorry @fred-atherden https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.13.557510v3 is now posted

fred-atherden commented 2 weeks ago

No worries - thanks Fiona!

elifesciences / publish-reviewed-preprints-issues