elifesciences / publish-reviewed-preprints-issues

MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

MSID: 100652 Version: 1 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.27.582373 #954

Closed fred-atherden closed 1 month ago

fred-atherden commented 2 months ago

MSID: 100652

Version: 1

Preprint DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.27.582373

Step 1. Awaiting reviews

Editorial to post reviews via hypothesis

Useful links:

For trouble shooting (e.g. no Docmaps available):

Step 2. Preview reviewed preprint

Production QC content ahead of publication

Instructions:

Useful links:

Step 3: Awaiting search reindex

This step adds the reviewed preprint to the homepage: https://elifesciences.org

The search reindex is triggered once an hour. We need the reviewed preprint to be indexed as the search application serves the journal homepage.

Useful links:

Step 4: Published! PDF requested

Waiting for PDF to be generated

Useful links:

Step 5: Introduce PDF to data folder and git repo

Upload PDF to relevent folder in git repo https://github.com/elifesciences/enhanced-preprints-data/

Step 6: Done!

elife-bot commented 1 month ago
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c7) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c12) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c39) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c40) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c60) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c62) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
warning: [mixed-citation-other-publication-flag] mixed-citation in reference (id=c83) has a publication-type='other'. Is that correct?
info: [article-version-flag] This is preprint version 1.2.
rkcook312 commented 1 month ago

Hi @acollings, should the term 'useful' be adjusted here? Image

acollings commented 1 month ago

Thanks @rkcook312 yes, should be sorted now!

rkcook312 commented 1 month ago

https://sciety.org/evaluations/hypothesis:VUnwoHDrEe-tW0Mlce7s6A/content