Closed naushinthomson closed 3 years ago
@naushinthomson @JGilbert-eLife @Melissa37 @FAtherden-eLife This page is now ready for your review:
Thanks!
Spotted a typo in the message for conf-doi-test-1
:
XXXXXX is a conference ref without a doi, but it's a conference which is know to possibly have dois - (XXXXXX). Should it have one?
Will change know
for known
.
Think I'm going to have to make pre
(warning) and final
(error) equivalents for some of these tests, so that eventually we can have a hard barrier which doesn't allow anything with errors to move onto author proofing. I can update this page with that myself though, if desired.
Nothing further to ad - thanks for this.
Looks good to me!
One thing I was thinking about, this does not cover the scenario of when an abstract or paper is published in a supplement to a journal. We used to do this at the BMJ, here is an example: https://ard.bmj.com/search/volume%3A79%20issue%3ASuppl%2B1%20jcode%3Aannrheumdis%20sort%3Arelevance-rank?facet%5Btoc-section-id%5D%5B0%5D=Metabolic%20pathways%20during%20the%20regulation%20of%20inflammation%20and%20immunity
In that case, the journal-title and suppl is used for the citation, not the conference title and location.
Do we need to make this distinction clear in the explanation at the top?
Could you use a real example in the table - the DOI provided there points to a journal article and not a conference proceeding
Also, in the screenshot from the kitchen sink we've got the title of the conference wrong :-(
Is there an available reference that is real that has a conference title and a conference name? Looking for cite as info for 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) there is no conference title:
Do we have any rules about the conference location? Like what we do or do not publish in there (city, state, country)?
Details for conference references can usually be found online, however there is no central indexing service for conferences as there is for journals.
I don't think this is true and should not be stated: https://www.crossref.org/education/content-registration/content-type-markup-guide/conference-proceedings/
Not all journals register DOIs and Crossref is a central indexing service for conference proceedings if a publisher chooses to use it :-)
err-elem-cit-confproc-10-1 Error:
is required. Reference 'XXXXXX' has XXXXXX elements. Action: Every conference reference must contain a conference name. This error indicates that no conference name is present. Compare the reference to the original manuscript file to check for processing errors such as the conference name being tagged as a conference title or as part of the article title. If one has not been provided, please query the author with the following: Please provide the conference name for this reference.
This makes me think we should potentially ditch the conference title tag...? Might make of a more simple life!
Action: This error will appear if a journal reference has a first page value larger than the last page value (this can happen if the authors truncate the last page, e.g. 123–34). If possible, look the article up online to find the correct page range. If this is not possible, add the following author query: Please provide the correct page range for this reference.
I wonder whether we look a bit silly asking this if an author has provided 123-24 and whether we should change the AQ to "is the last page of this reference 124? More work for Exeter but if the author provided a truncated version s/he might say it is correct as it is to a human reader!
err-elem-cit-confproc-9-2-2 Error: A
Needs a space in here: elements
Can we ask Exeter to add iso dates to conf-date? https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/tag-library/1.2/element/conf-date.html
Looks good to me, thanks!
err-elem-cit-confproc-10-1 Error: is required. Reference 'XXXXXX' has XXXXXX elements. Action: Every conference reference must contain a conference name. This error indicates that no conference name is present. Compare the reference to the original manuscript file to check for processing errors such as the conference name being tagged as a conference title or as part of the article title. If one has not been provided, please query the author with the following: Please provide the conference name for this reference.
This makes me think we should potentially ditch the conference title tag...? Might make of a more simple life!
I looked into this based on the list Fred provided. It looks like conferences on the SPIE digital library are a good example of references with both title and name e.g. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.860783
Can we ask Exeter to add iso dates to conf-date? https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/tag-library/1.2/element/conf-date.html
We do not currently use conf-date and year already has this.
err-elem-cit-confproc-10-1 Error: is required. Reference 'XXXXXX' has XXXXXX elements. Action: Every conference reference must contain a conference name. This error indicates that no conference name is present. Compare the reference to the original manuscript file to check for processing errors such as the conference name being tagged as a conference title or as part of the article title. If one has not been provided, please query the author with the following: Please provide the conference name for this reference.
This makes me think we should potentially ditch the conference title tag...? Might make of a more simple life!
I looked into this based on the list Fred provided. It looks like conferences on the SPIE digital library are a good example of references with both title and name e.g. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.860783
So when you download the citation this is what you get for bibtex:
@inproceedings{10.1117/12.860783, author = {Patrick J. La Rivière and Darin Clark and Alexandra Rojek and Phillip Vargas and Xianghui Xiao and Francesco DeCarlo and Gordon Kindlmann and Keith Cheng}, title = {{Optimizing synchrotron microCT for high-throughput phenotyping of zebrafish}}, volume = {7804}, booktitle = {Developments in X-Ray Tomography VII}, editor = {Stuart R. Stock}, organization = {International Society for Optics and Photonics}, publisher = {SPIE}, pages = {186 -- 193}, keywords = {Synchrotron, MicroCT, Zebrafish}, year = {2010}, doi = {10.1117/12.860783}, URL = {https://doi.org/10.1117/12.860783} }
And this is what you get for ris: Title: Optimizing synchrotron microCT for high-throughput phenotyping of zebrafish (inproceedings) Author: Patrick J. La Rivière and Darin Clark and Alexandra Rojek and Phillip Vargas and Xianghui Xiao and Francesco DeCarlo and Gordon Kindlmann and Keith Cheng Booktitle: Proc.SPIE Year: 2010 Volume: 7804 Month: 9 ...
Personally I don't think it would be bad thing to smish them together into one tag if we get them. Nobody is using the proper tags by the looks of things :-) and it prevents confusion over which tag to us.
WDYT?
Looks like we didn't include conference title for Libero Editor - https://github.com/libero/editor/issues/100
[Edit: I don't recall the reasoning why, there's no discussion about it in the original ticket]
Possible reason - looks like the source
doesn't display on the site currently, so if we do decide to keep it, we should get that fixed. e.g.:
<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Woody</surname>
<given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Capitanio</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ostap</surname>
<given-names>EM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goldman</surname>
<given-names>YE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year>
<article-title>An ultra-fast EOD-based force-clamp detects rapid biomechanical transitions. in
10347</article-title>
<source>Optical Trapping and Optical Micromanipulation XIV; 103470Q</source>
<conf-name>SPIE Nanoscience + Engineering</conf-name>
<conf-loc>San Diego, California</conf-loc>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/12.2277130</pub-id>
</element-citation>
OK, I'll update to remove Conference title/source as a field we use.
Definition of done