Closed jo-elimu closed 3 months ago
The recent change in the CustomDispatcherServlet.java
file adjusts how the application scans for JPA @Entity
annotated classes. Specifically, it alters the package scanning mechanism to use the package name retrieved from the BaseEntity
class instead of a hard-coded package string.
File Path | Change Summary |
---|---|
src/main/java/ai/elimu/web/servlet/CustomDispatcherServlet.java |
Updated method signature for scanning JPA @Entity classes, changing from a hard-coded package name to dynamically using BaseEntity 's package name. |
src/main/java/ai/elimu/web/servlet/CustomDispatcherServlet.java (1)
`84-84`: **LGTM! But verify the existence and accessibility of `BaseEntity`.** The code changes are approved as they improve maintainability by removing the hardcoded package name. Ensure that the `BaseEntity` class is correctly defined and accessible.Verification successful
--- **The existence and accessibility of `BaseEntity` are confirmed.** The `BaseEntity` class is defined in `src/main/java/ai/elimu/model/BaseEntity.java` as a public abstract class. The dynamic retrieval of the package name from this class is valid and improves maintainability. - `src/main/java/ai/elimu/model/BaseEntity.java`: `public abstract class BaseEntity implements Serializable`Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and accessibility of the `BaseEntity` class. # Test: Search for the `BaseEntity` class definition. Expect: The class should be defined in the codebase. rg --type java 'class BaseEntity' ``` Length of output: 139
Attention: Patch coverage is 0%
with 1 line
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 15.26%. Comparing base (
1db5f4f
) to head (db4e2fc
). Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
.../ai/elimu/web/servlet/CustomDispatcherServlet.java | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
refs #1684