Open bianchini88 opened 12 months ago
This could be considered resolved.
@stephan-nylinder As it was originally phrased, this would be solved. The idea of how good is F-UJI in assessing FAIRness of the data could be, however, debatable. Also, FAIRsharing does provide recommendations for repositories, but I do not think these are assessed on the spot (as opposed to F-UJI, which performs a live assessment of a dataset).
Link to the page of interest https://elixir-europe-training.github.io/ELIXIR-TrP-FAIR-Converge/units/data-repositories/topics/1-repositories-and-FAIR/
Describe what you would like to change on the page
General comment(s) It is dedicated to data, not to the whole repository? Does it miss some specific aspects of the repository itself?
perhaps find in addition a tool that assesses repositories as a whole? or a catalogue that does this type of assessment at the repository level?
OK this is done below with FAIRsharing I believe