Closed pinarpink closed 1 year ago
@rwwh would you approve the renaming of the "Sensitive data" page as "Data sensitivity"?
I have no fundamental problem with the naming. However note three things:
If it called anything like "Data Classification" the index becomes useless: nobody will look for content about sensitive data under that name, and there are so many other forms of classification that are not sensitivity-related and not mentioned on that page.
I'm not dealing with tools list: this is probably a typical "specialist" vs "compatible" issue. Is your supermarket listed under "eggs" in the yellow pages? Nope. Similarly, we have to decide whether the tag "sensitive data" (as example) should be attached to any tool that can deal with sensitive data (i.e. all those that are not incompatible with it), or only to tools that perform specialized services for sensitive data.
Thank you Rob. Let's go for "Data sensitivity". An outcome of the recent hackathon is a feature that allows referring to tools from within text in a manner that the site theme understands; tag-based linking of tools to pages and the automatic tool listings will disappear.
@elixir-europe/rdmkit-editors, do we change Sensitive data to Data sensitivity?
This page addresses the topic of detemining and reducing data sensitivity. we can consider renaming the page from "Sensitive data" to "Data sensitivity" to better reflect page content.
This page lists in the tools section to several tools, mostly frameworks and environments to host and process sensitive data. The listing is due to the "sensitive data" markup on tools in the tools tabke. the page text makes to reference to any of the tools. so I'd suggest for each tool
For the following two tools: