Closed christopherlai closed 2 months ago
I would have preferred an issue for better conversation, but 🤷
You have removed the test for
upcase_first/1
and the only place that it is called, but you didn't remove the now unused and untesteddef upcase_first(...)
. Please also remove the function definition when it is unused and untested.Otherwise this looks good
Sorry about that. Seemed like a simple issue so I opened a PR. Will remember to start a discussion in the future.
Removed upcase_first
.
I would have preferred an issue for better conversation, but 🤷 You have removed the test for
upcase_first/1
and the only place that it is called, but you didn't remove the now unused and untesteddef upcase_first(...)
. Please also remove the function definition when it is unused and untested. Otherwise this looks goodSorry about that. Seemed like a simple issue so I opened a PR. Will remember to start a discussion in the future.
Removed
upcase_first
.
No worries really, I'm just a cross the Ts and dot the Is kind of guy.
Thanks for the work @christopherlai !
Thanks for the work @christopherlai !
Happy to help, but it was purely self-serving. Needed this fix for myself.
What's the schedule for cutting a new release hex?
I'll see about a patch release with this and another bugfix (already merged) probably tomorrow
patch is out as 0.1.4
Fixes a bug with package names that contain underscores like
package test_service.v1.FooBar
. This will generate a module namedTestService.V1.FooBar
in Elixir.Currently if a package with underscore is used, it results in the following list
["Test_service", "V1", "FooBar"]
and failsModule.safe_concat/1
because this atom does not exist.Test_service
should beTestService
.