Open josevalim opened 1 year ago
OTP 26.2 added this:
process_info/2 now supports lookup of values for
specific keys in the process dictionary. For example,
{{dictionary, Key}, Value} = process_info(Pid,
{dictionary, Key}).
In this case we straight delegate to process_info
, so we don't need to do anything additionally.
Since logger
is not mentioned here I would like to ask if such error:
Failure while translating Erlang's logger event
is known? Just want to give it a try and compile Elixir
from main
using asdf
and Erlang
version 27.0-rc1
and I got 11 errors with same logger
problem.
1) test translates :proc_lib crashes with neighbour with name (Logger.TranslatorTest)
test/logger/translator_test.exs:575
Assertion with =~ failed
code: assert capture_log(:info, fn ->
ref = Process.monitor(pid)
send(pid, :message)
send(pid, :go)
receive do
{:DOWN, ^ref, _, _, _} -> :ok
end
end) =~ ~r"Ancestors: \[#PID<\d+\.\d+\.\d+>\]
Neighbours:
Logger.TranslatorTest \(#PID<\d+\.\d+\.\d+>\)
Initial Call: Logger.TranslatorTest.sleep/1
Current Call: Logger.TranslatorTest.sleep/1
Ancestors: \[#PID<\d+\.\d+\.\d+>, #PID<\d+\.\d+\.\d+>\]
"
left: "\e[31m\n06:54:37.503 [error] Failure while translating Erlang's logger event\n** (MatchError) no match of right handside value: [pid: #PID<0.203.0>, registered_name: [], process_label: :undefined, error_info: {:error, %RuntimeError{message: \"oops\"}, [{Logger.TranslatorTest, :\"-test translates :proc_lib crashes with neighbour with name/1-fun-0-\", 1, [file: ~c\"test/logger/translator_test.exs\", line: 578, error_info: %{module: Exception}]}, {:proc_lib, :init_p_do_apply, 3, [file: ~c\"proc_lib.erl\", line: 323]}]}, ancestors: [#PID<0.202.0>], message_queue_len: 1, messages: [:message], links: [#PID<0.205.0>], dictionary: [], trap_exit: false, status: :running, heap_size: 610, stack_size: 29, reductions: 513]\n (logger 1.17.0-dev) lib/logger/translator.ex:413: Logger.Translator.report_crash/4\n (logger 1.17.0-dev) lib/logger/utils.ex:47: Logger.Utils.translate/5\n (logger 1.17.0-dev) lib/logger/utils.ex:19: Logger.Utils.translator/2\n (kernel 9.3) logger_backend.erl:102: :logger_backend.do_apply_filters/4\n (kernel 9.3) logger_backend.erl:87: :logger_backend.apply_filters/4\n (kernel 9.3) logger_backend.erl:33::logger_backend.log_allowed/3\n (stdlib 6.0) proc_lib.erl:344: :proc_lib.exit_p/3\n\n\e[0m"
right: ~r/Ancestors: \[#PID<\d+\.\d+\.\d+>\]\nNeighbours:\n Logger.TranslatorTest \(#PID<\d+\.\d+\.\d+>\)\n Initial Call: Logger.TranslatorTest.sleep\/1\n Current Call: Logger.TranslatorTest.sleep\/1\n Ancestors: \[#PID<\d+\.\d+\.\d+>, #PID<\d+\.\d+\.\d+>\]\n/
stacktrace:
test/logger/translator_test.exs:583: (test)
This happens on ==> logger (ex_unit)
step with such info on the bottom:
Finished in 1.5 seconds (0.4s on load, 0.00s async, 1.0s sync)
3 doctests, 142 tests, 11 failures
Randomized with seed 488786
make: *** [Makefile:112: test_logger] Error 2
Build failed, cleaning...
I wonder if something was changed or it's just a bug
on main
branch? :thinking:
Erlang is passing more information to its logger, so it is something we will tackle once we start running our test suite against Erlang 27.
Any plans to Elixirify the new Erlang json module?
We will most likely wrap it with a protocol, but that will be part of Erlang/OTP 28 as far as I know, so not a concern right now but rather roughly in a year from now.
The target of the json module is OTP 27:
https://x.com/michalmuskala/status/1759666121320419743?s=46&t=FfKER0z4daYePSLFkNoU2A
Ah, thank you. So I will add it to the list. We can probably backport the Erlang modules if we want to have it sooner, but we need to have discussions on the API. So maybe on Elixir v1.18.
I'd be happy to discuss how to best integrate the new module into Elixir given the combination of Erlang stdlib, Elixir stdlib, and Jason. I was planning to release Jason 2.0 integrating with the new library, but if there are plans to integrate straight into Elixir, this is likely even better.
The current implementation in the PR contains some code patterns that benefit from some new optimisations in OTP 27, so there are some additional considerations around that as well, when back-porting to run on older Erlang releases.
I think this was released in OTP 26.2, it would be cool to expose getting a process dictionary value for specific key in the Process module (either another clause for Process.get
or allow this in Process.info
- currently a guard prevents it)
edit: I see this was discussed above but the problem with the guard was not brought up. It can be worked around by using a one element list though.
@michallepicki please send a PR to relax the guard? We don't need to wait for Erlang/OTP 27 for that. :)
@josevalim We should also add File.read/2
. OTP 27 added :file.read_file/2
with option :raw
https://www.erlang.org/doc/apps/kernel/file.html#read_file/2
To be implemented when Erlang 27 is released:
To be implemented when we require Erlang 27 exclusively:
File.read/2
that wraps:file.read_file/2
proc_lib:get_label
shell_docs_markdown
to convert Markdown to HTML and use that for ANSI printing (https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/8077)Please do not send PRs for those, as it will take a while until we can effectively accept them.