The box is not very informative as it displays only the project "title".
in case of many partners involved, the title gets very long but does not contribute to overall clarity
Suggestion
1) [to discuss] enrich model of contract by name (unique in scope of a project)
2) [to discuss] enrich model of contract by contract type (DSA, CA, MTA, MDTA, Collaboration agreemnet, ...) - is there an onthology we could use?
3) display in the box more attributes - id? name, type, remarks, ...
Align with features of other systems keeping the documentation (UNI level legal?)
The box is not very informative as it displays only the project "title".
Suggestion
1) [to discuss] enrich model of contract by
name(unique in scope of a project) 2) [to discuss] enrich model of contract bycontract type(DSA, CA, MTA, MDTA, Collaboration agreemnet, ...) - is there an onthology we could use? 3) display in the box more attributes -id?name,type,remarks, ...Align with features of other systems keeping the documentation (UNI level legal?)