mickel8
commented
6 months ago @LVala as you noticed, it looks like all known use-cases might be achieved using addTrack but because I already implemented this and to be consistent with the official W3C standard I would merge. If we find out this to be problematic in maintenance, we can remove it in the future.
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #51 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 88.61% 89.02% +0.40% ========================================== Files 24 24 Lines 949 966 +17 ========================================== + Hits 841 860 +19 + Misses 108 106 -2 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/pull/51?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=elixir-webrtc) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [lib/ex\_webrtc/peer\_connection.ex](https://app.codecov.io/gh/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/pull/51?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=elixir-webrtc#diff-bGliL2V4X3dlYnJ0Yy9wZWVyX2Nvbm5lY3Rpb24uZXg=) | `89.20% <100.00%> (+0.54%)` | :arrow_up: | ... and [2 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/pull/51/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=elixir-webrtc) ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/elixir-webrtc/ex_webrtc/pull/51?src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=elixir-webrtc). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=elixir-webrtc) > `Δ = absolute