Closed DougDame closed 3 years ago
Hello @DougDame, Thanks for the feedback. Do you have a reference for the updated scoring algorithm? Thanks!
The table above is from:
... which I thought was excellent work when it first appeared, and still do.
HTH - d.d.
Thanks for the reference @DougDame!
Hi @ellessenne, my colleague (@SY-CHIA) have also done this in the code snippets mentioned in #36. I can integrate it into the package and file a PR if it is ok with you.
I am closing this, as it is now implemented in the GitHub version of {comorbidity} (see e.g. #37, #38). Will make it to CRAN ASAP.
The doco says this on WEIGHTS:
"Each condition from the Charlson score is assigned a score when computing the weighted Charlson index, irrespectively of the coding system utilised. In particular, diabetes with complications, hemiplegia/paraplegia, renal disease, and malignancies are assigned a score of 2; moderate/severe liver disease is assigned a score of 3; metastatic solid tumour and AIDS/HIV are assigned a score of 6; the remaining comorbidities are assigned a score of 1. comorbidity allows the option of applying a hierarchy of comorbidities should a more severe version be present: by choosing to do so (and that is the default behaviour of comorbidity) a type of comorbidity is never computed more than once for a given patient."
Those are the weights generally used before Quan et al updated the ICD-code lists and derived new weights from a newer and much larger dataset, as shown below. The AIDS/HIV @ 6 was the clue that I first noticed.
My thought is that the Quan weights should at least be an option. Making it the default at this point might be disruptive to existing users.
Doug