ZigZag operation doesn't compensate for tool diameter offset when Gcode generated.

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Created a  Width 3.5" x Length 1,985" x Depth .25" solid to run on .5" 
aluminum stock.
2. Selected cutting depth of .025 for each pass.
3. Had minimum X set to 2" for the profile.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
With minimum X set to 2" and using a 3/8" dia end mill the gcode should have 
generated a starting point for X of 2.1875 but instead it generated an X 
starting coordinate of X2.0000 completely ignoring the entered tool offset in 
the profile. I didn't notice it until I ended up ruining a piece I had been 
working on for a couple of hours :(

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
I'm using the latest version of HeeksCNC 13.1  with Windows XP SP3

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dunamis1...@yahoo.com on 13 Jun 2010 at 4:19

Attachments:

[Gcode file.txt](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/heekscnc/issue-223/comment-0/Gcode file.txt)

elliotf / heekscnc

ZigZag operation doesn't compensate for tool diameter offset when Gcode generated. #223