Closed elliottomlinson closed 3 years ago
Copying the latest mention here:
DuncanUszkay1 I'd be curious to hear your thoughts on 'unifying' the effect phrasing to suit a definition scheme like this:
Glyph Term Read as β‘ Cast "Casting this card lets you ..." β Hand "Holding this card in your hand lets you ..."
- From #94
Personally I think it's the way to go since it's accessible and the phrasing's mostly arbitrary anyway. I've adjusted a couple of phrasings (ex. 24d9875) to suit it where it didn't make much of a difference - It wouldn't take long at all to double-check the catalogue so don't let that influence your view on it.
https://github.com/elliottomlinson/rpcg/pull/111#issuecomment-892889072
Rules Card: Glyphs
See #80. Any glyphs that appear on the cards. Something like:
We could include their definitions alongside (With our design right now this will only matter for Cast and Hand as the inset text-box on the grey cards can have their definition too)
Or try to define each as a text substitution. Right now I like this solution best:
Note: Greys excluded for the moment as we're planning on using a format like this:
Originally posted by @elliottomlinson in https://github.com/elliottomlinson/rpcg/issues/91#issuecomment-891250655