Closed razzeee closed 5 years ago
Sounds sane to me.
I also wanted to add a Features
section which I forgot about.
Should highlight that we only have diagnostics right now.
Do you want to add this to this PR? I think that would make sense.
Pushed another change, should I squash this down to one commit?
I'll merge this right now, but eventually I want to replace many parts of the README. There's quite some stuff that needs some addressing.
I use a lot more libraries. It would make sense to add a comment in the 'spirit' of the 'Libraries used' Section instead of listing them actually. Something like 'combines haskell-lsp with the elm compiler as a library to check elm code'.
Also the 'Conceptual inner workings' Section is factually correct right now, but I want to move away from creating many language servers, each per
elm.json
file, since the LSP could and should be aware of multipleelm.json
files and handle those situations.