Closed razzeee closed 3 years ago
Not sure if reading elm-stuff is the problem you are having. There is a problem in node-elm-review
where an application elm.json
has elm-review
as a dependency, and elm-review
has elm-explorations/test
as a dependency. However, elm-explorations/test
isn't listed as an indirect dep like it should be (As far as I'm aware). The compiler is able to resolve this without the indirect dep, but we aren't. Maybe this is what you are seeing as well?
Fyi @jfmengels
Might be, but my test case is not with elm-review and only happens after deleting the global package cache
Oh okay. Well I looked at the compiler code, and it uses d.dat
to store the last "compile time", and if the elm.json modification time equals the last compile time, it doesn't need to do anything, everything is cached. In our case, if we wanted to support this, we would have to read all the cache files in elm-stuff to get the data (all dependency functions, types, etc), and it would be a lot of work to get everything working without source files (We wouldn't have any dependency source code to parse, just cache data).
Personally I don't think this is a use case we need to worry about, right now anyways.
Just FYI, the reason why there is a missing indirect dependency for that project (and a few others in elm-review
-land), is because even though it should be there, elm-test
crashes when it finds the same package in multiple places. That has been fixed in the upcoming elm-test
release (revision 5), so in that case, that should be an issue for very long anymore.
Agreed, will close this. This should be enough documentation.
Depedency resolving needs to load from elm-stuff first and then fall back to the global packages.