Open basghar opened 2 years ago
Thanks for reporting this! To set expectations:
Finally, please be patient with the core team. They are trying their best with limited resources.
Just ran into this same issue.
A workaround I found is to specify v0.19.1-4
, which has a commit that added support for ARM (for macOS Silicon). It also added support for linux_arm64
as a byproduct of this.
The current release, one patch version higher at v0.19.1-5
includes a commit that continues to support apple_arm64
but inadvertently drops support for linux_arm64
(which is what Docker uses on hosts that are Apple Silicon, i.e. apple_arm64
).
As an alternative nix
can be used to build docker images. Because nix
has support to build Elm on ARM.
Hi! Is it possible to merge this PR? Or to say what is the problem with it? Because I need to use a linux_arm64
version of elm
with npm
, and without this fix, it is currently impossible to do that.
Hello,
Any news regarding this PR? It's still a blocker for us. Is there any way we can help progressing this a bit faster?
Thanks!
Quick Summary: We use docker in order to support multi-platform dev environment. On M1 macs,
npm install -g elm
fails because there is no pre-build binary forlinux_arm64
. We want to avoid having different docker for different platform.This is use-case for #2007
Additional Details
None