@et1975 @MangelMaxime With the release of Fable 4, users will have to update some packages so it's a good time to do some cleanup (we should also take the chance to release Elmish 4 as stable). We've been discussing for some time to split Fable.React into a types package containing only bindings (as with the Browser packages) and another containing the helpers. This prevents that packages like Feliz need to take the full Fable.React dependency only for compatibility.
Are you ok with this change? If so, would it be possible to push a beta release? Thanks a lot!
Note: I've also tried to improve the project metadata for publishing by using string interpolation in the build script, replace the deprecated tags (PackageIconUrl, PackageLicenceUrl) and add the README file, but I'm not sure if it works correctly. Could you please check?
@et1975 @MangelMaxime With the release of Fable 4, users will have to update some packages so it's a good time to do some cleanup (we should also take the chance to release Elmish 4 as stable). We've been discussing for some time to split Fable.React into a types package containing only bindings (as with the Browser packages) and another containing the helpers. This prevents that packages like Feliz need to take the full Fable.React dependency only for compatibility.
Are you ok with this change? If so, would it be possible to push a beta release? Thanks a lot!
Note: I've also tried to improve the project metadata for publishing by using string interpolation in the build script, replace the deprecated tags (PackageIconUrl, PackageLicenceUrl) and add the README file, but I'm not sure if it works correctly. Could you please check?