In https://github.com/fako1024/slimcap/issues/55 it was shown that slimcap supports IPv6 jumbograms already. However, since the transport layer is stored in a different location than usually expected in our current IPv6 parsing protocol specific parsing currently doesn't work (e.g. extraction of TCP / UDP ports).
This is not limited to jumbograms - any extension header will be ignored at present.
DoD
[ ] Add samples to E2E tests (obtained in linked issue + additional ones)
[ ] Add synthetic test to capture package
[ ] Adjust IPv6 parsing to support extraction of extension headers / transport layer information
In https://github.com/fako1024/slimcap/issues/55 it was shown that
slimcapsupports IPv6 jumbograms already. However, since the transport layer is stored in a different location than usually expected in our current IPv6 parsing protocol specific parsing currently doesn't work (e.g. extraction of TCP / UDP ports).This is not limited to jumbograms - any extension header will be ignored at present.
DoD
capturepackage